I have simply tried not to understand how a man can solely claim credit on how other mortals became what they became. Where is the place of God and destiny in the affairs of man?
And come to think of it, it is now clear that he has never been a selfless leader, as he impostored, to all other crooks he mentored and foisted on the people. He was simply placing them on strategic positions to aid his last stage final robbery operation plan on the badly bulleted, wounded and incapacitated country, the same way a robbery gang leader will station boys around the routes and frontage of a bank or other targeted place of operation in order to have a smooth shooting and carting away of mints, after decimating all security apparatus and cordoning off his target.
For the self-proclaimed sole maker of men, he was not helping these his “boys” to fulfil their destinies but to fulfil his own selfish destiny. There is no crime in nurturing selfish destiny. But just the way gang members stationed around operation target can turn against their leader or one another when interests clash, probably, a gang member found that one of the persons shot in the bank or robbery scene is his own blood sister or beloved mother, the same way he could review alliance immediately and turn against the gang interest, the same way all these awon “eleyis” have turned against their kingpin mentor now.
In the first place, their association and touted loyalty were not built on good conscience. It has been an alliance for destructive purposes on the people. It’s an association and loyalty built on collective robbery of the people. So which moral pay back or reciprocating obligation are we talking about?
Be the first to comment