Kogi land dispute: Lawyer faults Bello’s comments on judgment

The Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello has been accused of working to create crisis in the state by his criticism of a judgement given by a Federal High Court in Lokoja in favour of Attah Igala, Michael Ameh Oboni 11.

The court had, in the judgement given on June 2 this year, held that Ajaokuta, Lokoja and Koton-Karfe are part of Igala land and within the Attah Igala’s kindom.

The court, which awarded N10bilion cost in favour of the Atah Igala, noted that the three communities belonged to the Igala people on the strength of the “1841 business relationship” between the colonialists and the then Attah Igala.

But, in a broadcast, Governor Bello among others, expressed displeasure about the judgment, noting that it amounted to imperialism.

Reacting to the Governor’s comments on the judgment, a lawyer and rights activist, Daniel Makolo advised the Kogi State Government to either appeal the court’s decision or obey it rather than seeking to pitch the people of the state against the traditional ruler.

Makolo argued that the Attah Igala did nothing wrong by approaching the court, and that, as a democratically elected governor, rather resorting to name calling, Bello ought to commend the traditional ruler for seeking redress in court.

He said: “The Governor chose to give the judgment of the court of competent jurisdiction the colouration of imperialism. This is unfortunate. Imperialism has no bearing whatsoever with the judgment of the court.

“The court is meant to interpret the law and enforce citizens’ rights, based on incontrovertible evidence placed before it, which the Federal High Court, sitting in Lokoja, Kogi State has done in this case.

See also  Police Arrests 3 For Cyber-Related Offences, Uncovers 50,000 email accounts/passwords from a suspect

“Let justice be done, though heavens fall, is a legal maxim, which dictates that, justice must be realized regardless of consequences. This, the Federal High Court sitting in Lokoja has complied with in this judgment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*